Datarails promises to "transform your Excel into a lean, mean FP&A machine." Their biggest selling point is that they help you automate repetitive processes in Excel.
As spreadsheet fans ourselves, we have to give Datarails credit for this. After all, 90% of FP&A teams supplement financial planning platforms with spreadsheets.
…So you might as well make the spreadsheet your financial planning platform.
On their website, Datarails lists key use cases like:
They also promise to help you "spend more time analyzing data and less time collecting it."
And that sounds great.
But how do they deliver on their promise? Let's take a look at some reviews.
There’s a reason Datarails is popular—it covers all the basic FP&A operations within your regular spreadsheets so you don’t need to overhaul the tools you use.
Datarails is designed to compile all your data and displays on a single dashboard. It’s also in the process of bringing AI features into the mix for faster, more accurate planning. But going deeper into the details, here are some of the most common pros and cons from real users.
Several FP&A professionals indicated that Datarails:
But like any tool, Datarails has limitations. Reviewers in 2024 mentioned that:
When the company launched in 2015, Datarails focused heavily on ambitious SMBs looking to scale up. It now also handles established mid-market businesses and enterprises of over 1000 employees.
No matter the size of the organization, Datarails is strictly for spreadsheet users, whether that’s Excel or Google Sheets. That’s good news due to the popularity of spreadsheets among finance professionals, but it’s not just about familiar functionality.
Excel and Google Sheets are incredibly versatile and almost universally recognized. This allows internal stakeholders to follow your progress more easily. When everybody in your company is speaking the same language, you can cut out a lot of confusion and misunderstandings between the CFO and the rest of the company.
Datarails isn’t transparent about its pricing on its website. It offers custom packages for each business’s specific use cases, making it hard to give a ballpark figure. However, online reviews have said Datarails is more expensive than comparable FP&A options.
For more information on Datarails, check out these other Datarails reviews:
“Exporting large volumes of data or directly integrating to BI tools like Tableau could be improved. Permission management is time-consuming and highly detailed. I wish there was a better way to lock an entire version with one or two clicks.”
“It integrates well with excel, so using it once the data was imported was easy. A bit tough to learn at first but the implementation consultants are excellent.”
“I have had some frustrations with the lack of support to solve my immediate needs. While the CSM was out the last few weeks, which I was unaware of, my only option has been emailing back and forth with Datarails support, or links to articles that didn't really answer my questions. Datarails is supposed to save me time, not waste it right?”
“Flexibility with Excel is key. I find it easy to use and scalable but integration with Sage is not perfect and requires a workaround.”
“I like the flexibility and how intuitive the Datarail platform is. I only had great experience working with their support team and they answered in a timely manner every time I had questions. However, I would love a Datarails team that could recreate our financial package from our Excel version into Datarail because that part can be very time-consuming.”
“The Excel implementation is great, but the ability to get efficient is labored. Cons include the inability to know what type of user you are and what access you have. You may be trying to accomplish a task and looking for an option that you may not even have access to. Also, the confusion of File Boxes and Data Mapping and integrations and configurations is all jumbled. More concise direction would be appreciated.”
“Planning with DataRails has streamlined our planning and forecasting cycles and helped us to standardize metrics, reporting, and analysis. It makes comparing plans, forecasts, and actuals across the organization easy and requires no training or overhead.”
“I would say that the most difficult part about using this software is managing the requests from management so that it doesn't compromise the value of the software.”
“Can handle multiple systems and locations with ease. It’s flexible, easy to use, and allows for planning at a granular level to improve budgeting.”
“There are limitations to the types of dashboards we need to create in the system. Some files we are unable to aggregate because of the data type which is crucial to a number of our reports. The file mapping can sometimes get confusing when there are additional columns that have been added and we need to reconfigure the mapping, but our historical data does not have the exact same data, it has caused issues in the past.”
“I think there are some rough-around-the-edges features that could be tweaked for quality of life, but nothing that is breaking anything. Mainly centered around more options in the widgets and dashboards”
“The Datarails product and support team have been very good to work with. The product has automated several very manual processes that save us time and deliver actionable information more quickly.”
After reading the customer reviews, here's a summary of what users feel Datarails does well:
That said, Datarails has plenty of areas to improve.
Datarails is built on Microsoft’s Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) legacy tech, which is falling out of favor in today's highly collaborative, remote world. This explains many of the frustrations people have with it:
These are all symptoms of an outdated base tech stack.
Datarails uses licenses to keep your sensitive financial data on lockdown, so you can't see a report without a Datarails license.
Makes sense, right? After all, that's your company's financial data. It should be secure.
But if that were the case, why not just use something like the Google Drive permissions model? Why require extra seats?
For companies trying to stick to responsible software spending, it's hard to justify extra seats just for viewing reports.
Here's an example:
As a CFO, you want to send your VP of People a hiring budget. You create it in Datarails and share it. You had to buy an additional Datarails license and connection for this use case.
The workaround?
Use the Datarails-provided templates, formulas, and formatting. Share your budgets and reports within the web portal.
And while that sounds great, it creates procedural problems.
If the person without a license makes an edit, it breaks the model. And then you can't see their changes.
Because Datarails was built on a legacy tech stack, its formulas are complex and easy to break. They rely on hidden columns and brittle cell references.
So being a Datarails power user requires learning those proprietary formulas.
Alternatively, you can eschew them altogether and use Excel workarounds, which defeats the point of buying FP&A software.
Here's an example of what these formulas look like:
The formula in this screenshot from a Datarails video by @DR.YTD takes nine optional arguments.
However, there are easier ways to calculate year to date (YTD).
Likewise, the Datarails proprietary formulas are just that: proprietary. You can't tweak them.
Imagine this:
All of your reporting is built on brittle formulas like this. But you want to change some of your reporting templates.
Now, instead of self-serving, you have to embark on a project with a Datarails CSM.
So all the time you think you've saved with this new tool gets eaten up in learning how to use it.
FP&A software should make your life easier. It should save you time, automate repetitive tasks, and eliminate the no-value-add work that burdens many finance teams.
But how do you properly evaluate FP&A software?
Here, we’re going to go over some quick highlights. If you want a more comprehensive checklist, head to our blog.
Technology should democratize FP&A processes, allowing you to build and maintain reports without the need for consultants.
Unlike a tool that spotlights rigid reports with proprietary formulas and complex underlying logic, great FP&A software empowers and augments your existing and preferred workflows.
You should be able to spin up your own reports or dashboards and share them with whomever you need, without waiting for consultants or troubleshooting formulas.
FP&A software should seamlessly integrate with the tools and environments your team already uses. While many FP&A teams work in Excel, other departments might prefer Google Sheets or Excel within Microsoft Teams. When you’re working under pressure, you can’t leave room for mistakes, and software compatibility is one of the best ways to achieve that.
There’s no way of escaping a learning curve when adopting new FP&A software. However, the best tools hide complexity from the user, allowing even non-technical team members to utilize the software effectively. This ease of use means team members can get on board quickly and avoid conflict that can come with extensive training.
FP&A software should provide quick time-to-value, avoiding long implementation periods and surprise costs. Implementation limbo can be a major burden on teams as it not only wastes money on the new product, it also invites pressure from superiors. We like to say you should plan a vacation, not an implementation, so look out for software that lets you hit the ground running.
Reliable customer support and detailed documentation can make a significant difference in the effectiveness of your FP&A software. It helps to smoothen the learning curve and digs you out of trouble when things go wrong. Always check online reviews to gauge the experience of real users when the mud hits the fan.
Top Datarails alternatives
While Datarails can be a good option for Excel-based SMBs who don't plan to scale, you should know about the other players in the FP&A industry.
Cube is a cloud-based FP&A platform that helps companies hit their numbers without having to sacrifice their spreadsheets. Our cloud-based FP&A software helps finance teams work more effectively by collecting and centralizing data into a single source of truth.
This empowers teams to create plans and reports based on that trusted data in the spreadsheets they know and love.
Cube transforms FP&A with a spreadsheet-native platform that offers fast, flexible, and scalable financial analysis for continuous collaboration and insights.
Many high-growth companies (like Masterworks and Unqork) use Cube for all their FP&A needs.
Because here's the thing:
Cube can do almost everything Datarails does and then some.
Cube:
Perhaps even more importantly, Cube was founded by a former CFO. The problems and use cases of FP&A have been baked into Cube since its inception.
FP&A teams already know and love spreadsheets. Cube simplifies many of the headaches of the often challenging planning process—like collecting actuals from other departments or checking and verifying that your numbers are correct—and lets teams turn their complicated budgeting process into a lean operation.
Check out all of the 5-star reviews on Capterra.
Sounds like a good fit? Book your demo with Cube today.
Features:
➡️ See all of our features here.
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing:
Datarails vs Cube
Cube is a powerful alternative to Datarails for SMBs and mid-market companies, especially for users who need enhanced flexibility across spreadsheet environments. Unlike Datarails, which only supports Excel versions from 2007 onwards, Cube provides full compatibility with Google Sheets and supports both Windows and Mac users seamlessly. Cube’s onboarding process is up to five times faster than Datarails’ implementation, offering a smooth, intuitive user experience that caters to both beginners and advanced users.
While Datarails can meet the needs of many smaller teams, its limitations may become apparent as businesses grow. Cube’s versatility and scalability ensure that companies can continue using the platform as they transition from SMBs to mid-market and eventually to enterprise levels.
Curious to see if Cube is a fit for your organization? Book your demo now.
Vena is a financial planning and analysis solution that allows companies to create a centralized solution with reliable automated workflows for data analysis and decision-making.
Vena supports companies’ financial systems by lessening the workload for manual labor and optimizing overall operational performance. With specific tasks assigned to each team member, automated processes help reduce bottlenecks and increase efficiency.
With the shift towards automation becoming more and more of a necessity for enterprises and organizations, Vena transitions your outdated company spreadsheets into detailed analyses that provide you with more data for strategic planning. With features like visual control, graphical data modeling, project budgeting forecasting, and more, Vena helps you adapt to modern finances.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing:
Vena doesn’t provide any set monthly pricing information. They offer a seven-day preview and will run a demo of their software to help you decide if you contact their team.
Datarails vs Vena
Datarails provides a secure introduction to FP&A software, making accessible for many teams. Vena, while also well-suited for SMBs, usually requires consultant-led implementation to build and manage financial models, often leading to higher setup costs than other out-of-the-box solutions. For companies prioritizing growth, Vena’s scalable features may be advantageous as they expand into enterprise status, positioning it as a viable option for mid-market businesses seeking long-term adaptability.
Both Datarails and Vena deliver robust Excel integration but lack support for Google Sheets and have limited Mac compatibility.
Founded in 2019, Mosaic is a strategic finance platform that creates real-time reporting, budgeting, and planning for better business decision-making. Mosaic allows companies to work in unison in pursuit of organizational goals.
Mosaic consolidates and transforms insights into accessible visuals for stakeholders and management. Like other finance software, Mosaic automates different financial operations to streamline the workflow.
Mosaic's biggest strength is its ability to provide pretty visuals that SaaS companies often want.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing:
Mosaic does not provide any pricing plan information. If you reach out to their sales team, they’ll give you a demo of the software and provide a custom quote.
For a full rundown of the top FP&A systems currently on the market, check out our article on Datarails competitors.
Datarails vs Mosaic
Both Datarails and Mosaic are tailored for mid-market companies, offering a similar range of tools and features for SMB finance teams. While Datarails is often preferred for its overall platform usability and user experience, Mosaic stands out for smoother initial implementation and responsive customer support. Mosaic also earns higher marks for ongoing feature updates and a forward-looking platform roadmap, making it a strong choice for teams focused on long-term innovation.
Planful provides real-time insights into business performance, helping companies identify challenges, seize opportunities, and take proactive action.
Built for large companies and enterprises, Planful streamlines complex financial workflows, from planning and budgeting to forecasting and reporting.
With AI and machine learning capabilities through Planful Predict, Planful helps top-level executives, like CFOs and CEOs, to achieve more accurate, faster decision-making.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing:
Planful doesn’t make any pricing plan public. You’ll need to reach out to their sales team for a quote.
Datarails vs Planful
Datarails is ideal for small to mid-sized businesses focused on staying within Excel, offering a user-friendly interface with AI-driven reporting that’s easy to adopt. Planful, on the other hand, is built for large enterprises needing comprehensive performance management and long-term growth support.
With features like Planful Predict, it leverages AI and machine learning for advanced forecasting and scenario analysis, ideal for high-level strategic planning. Datarails uses similar AI insights but also offers an AI chatbot to answer ad-hoc questions about budgeting and forecasting. In terms of implementation, Datarails is relatively straightforward, while Planful requires a longer setup and often multi-year contracts, fitting larger teams.
Prophix has been on the market since 1987 offering cloud-based budgeting, planning, forecasting, and reporting solutions. It comes with scenario analysis and what-if modeling, aiding data-driven, strategic decision-making.
With automated workflows and collaboration tools, Prophix uses “cubes” to design a planning model, either for generic planning or personnel planning. Its customization and scalability make it suitable for businesses of varying sizes, and it is available in both cloud-based and on-premises versions, offering flexibility based on IT infrastructure and preferences.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing:
If you’re interested in Prophix, you need to request a demo to get a quote.
Datarails vs Prophix
Datarails and Prophix are largely similar platforms with almost identical features, incorporating cash management, asset lifecycle management, strategic planning, and real-time data.
Prophix is appropriate for organizations of all sizes and industries, while Datarails focuses more on small to medium-sized enterprises. Datarails is tied to Microsoft Excel, which is familiar to most FP&A teams, whereas Prophix is based on its own platform and integrates with Microsoft 365 apps.
Anaplan is a cloud-native platform built to help large enterprises make data-driven decisions using real-time information. Designed for complex financial modeling and extensive collaboration, it has tools for creating detailed models, sharing data across teams, and aligning on projects.
It brings AI and machine learning capabilities to the table, adapting estimations to changing conditions. Companies can simulate scenarios, forecast with precision, and maintain consistent, centralized data for improved decision-making.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing:
Anaplan only reveals its pricing after a consultation with their team. That said, Peerspot reports the following pricing:
"The entry-level is anywhere from about $30,000 to $50,000 a year, however, it does go up significantly after that depending on the complexity and how much space you're using."
In other words, most customers can expect to pay significantly more than $50,000 for a basic subscription.
Datarails vs Anaplan
Datarails and Anaplan both offer competitive planning tools, but they target different business sizes and needs. Anaplan is aimed at large enterprises, while Datarails provides a more accessible, Excel-based solution ideal for SMBs and mid-market companies seeking simplicity.
Anaplan’s advanced modeling and scenario planning make it powerful for large-scale use, though Datarails’ focus on ease of use makes it preferable for smaller, agile teams that don’t require extensive customization.
For a full rundown of the top FP&A systems currently on the market, check out our article on Datarails competitors.
While Datarails is generally a decent option for your FP&A needs, the tool's shortcomings and complexity can make it a tough sell for many FP&A teams.
Ultimately, Datarails is aimed at SMBs, Excel-only shops, small (or solo) FP&A teams, and ERP and other source systems natively integrated with Datarails. However, its high customer churn means it doesn’t necessarily live up to the hype.
So if you’re looking for a Datarails alternative, we recommend giving Cube a try. To see how Cube can help you take your finance function to the next level, request a free demo today.
Sources cited: