Integrations

One card per source category, data flows in from anywhere.

View all integrations →

The Agentic Layer

The governed foundation — platform capabilities.

Reporting & Analysis

Business performance tracking, variance, and analytical insight.

See all →

Planning & Modeling

A comprehensive look at forward-looking corporate financial strategy.

See all →

Consolidation & Close

The entire financial close and data management cycle, at a high level.

See all →
Planning & modeling

Scenario planning on the numbers you actually close.

Model best, base, and worst case on live actuals in one governed model. Change a driver and the P&L, headcount, and cash recalculate together, in Cube or your spreadsheet, with every figure traced to the transaction behind it.

ERP / GLActuals
CRMPipeline
HRISHeadcount
DriversPrice +5%
CubeRevenue by scenario
$12.40M+$0.6M vs base
ActualsForecast →
Behind every scenario
Revenue=Base revenue $12.35M+ Price upside $1.22M− Volume downside $0.71M− Hiring delay $0.46M
Thousands of finance professionals, in every industry, run on Cube
The problem

Every what-if starts with copying the model.

The CEO asks what happens if bookings slip a quarter, and someone duplicates the workbook, rewires the links, and hopes nothing breaks. By the time the answer arrives, the question has changed.

Model_downside_v3_COPY.xlsxActuals pasted in last monthBase ≠ board plan by $312K

Copies multiply

Each scenario is a separate file, so a change to one assumption has to be made by hand in all of them.

The base is stale

Scenarios are built on last month’s actuals, so every case starts from the wrong number.

Answers arrive late

A simple what-if takes days to rebuild, and the decision it was meant to inform has already been made.

The solution

Run any what-if without copying the model.

Cube builds scenarios on the live base model, so every what-if starts current and compares side by side.

Copies multiply

Scenarios inside one model

Branch the plan in Cube instead of copying the file.

The base is stale

Always on live actuals

Every scenario starts from the latest actuals.

Answers arrive late

Answers in minutes

Change a driver and see revenue, cost, and cash move right away.

Why teams choose Cube

Every case, built on the same governed base.

One base, every case

Scenarios branch from the same live actuals, so the gap between cases is the assumption, not a copy error.

Drivers anyone can check

Price, volume, hiring, and timing are visible inputs, so anyone can see what changed between cases.

Compare side by side

Base, upside, and downside line up on one view, with every figure traceable to the source.

Every scenario number opens.

A downside case is only useful if the board trusts the base under it. In Cube, every scenario figure traces to the actuals and the driver change behind it.

A glass revenue bar opening into threads that lead to individual transactions
Drilldown
Downside impact · Q4$1,215.0K
Bookings slip$612.0K
Hiring delay$398.0K
Jul 06Enterprise deals · pushed one quarter$184.0K
Jul 08Mid-market deals · win rate −4 pts$96.5K
Jul 09EMEA hires · start dates +60 days$72.0K
+ 9 more drivers · Cube model
Source: Cube model
Workflows

Where teams put scenario planning to work.

Best, base, and worst case

Three cases from one live base, compared on one view.

Hiring plan

Roles, start dates, and comp modeled by case, tied to the P&L.

Board scenario reporting

The cases the board asks for, in the deck, from the governed model.

Pricing and demand shocks

A price change or a demand drop, recalculated across every entity.

Runway and capital planning

Cash runway under each case, so funding decisions come early.

Bookings scenarios

Commit, best, and pipeline cases flow into the plan by segment.

One connection

Scenarios on live actuals.

Cube connects your GL, CRM, and HRIS, three of the hundreds of source systems it speaks to, so every scenario starts from the same current base.

Your sources
Where it shows up
NetSuite
Actuals and the P&L
Salesforce
Pipeline and bookings
Workday
Headcount and comp
Data warehouse
Operational drivers
Scenario compare
Base, upside and downside
Hiring plan
Roles, timing and cost
Board deck
One governed answer

One governed model that turns what-ifs into operating intelligence. Actuals, pipeline, and headcount are mapped once, reconciled, and traced to the transaction.

Mapped onceReconciled to the GL

Change one driver. Every case recalculates.

Actuals land from NetSuite, pipeline from Salesforce, and headcount from Workday. Cube runs the governed formulas behind every cell, and each scenario publishes back to the model.

Behind every cellGoverned formula
Scenario revenue =
Base revenueNetSuite GL
+ Price upsidePrice driver · Cube model
− Volume downsideBookings slip · Salesforce
− Hiring delayStart dates · Workday
Scenario = base actuals + Σ driver change × sensitivity, by entity and department
Watch three scenarios build from one base.
Bring one question your CEO asked last quarter. On the demo, we model it live across base, upside, and downside.
Where you work

Every scenario, on every surface.

Cube connects the systems where your data lives to the tools where decisions happen. When a number changes in Cube, it updates in the spreadsheet, the board deck, the dashboard, and the answer in Slack or Claude. Everyone keeps their own view and permissions, and every figure traces back to the transaction.

See it on your numbers.
On the demo, we connect a source, publish a number once, and show it land in a spreadsheet, a deck, and chat.
AI Agents

Your digital finance team works while you sleep.

Four FP&Agents handle the always-on work across your data, reports, plans and business partners. Agents scale finance's capacity, while the people remain in control.

Before your first coffee
6:00 AM Actuals synced into your Excel model.
6:04 AM March bookings variance explained in #sales-leads.
6:10 AM Board deck refreshed with the latest numbers.
6:15 AM Q3 forecast rerun on new pipeline data.
9:00 AM CEO asks in Teams what changed. Answered.
Security & governance

Board-ready means audit-ready.

Delivering numbers everywhere only works if access travels with them. In Cube it does, enforced in the layer rather than in each tool.

Security & compliance
Every export, governed.

Every AI feature respects your permissions, and every edit, sync, and publish lands in one audit trail.

SOC 1 & 2
Type 2
Certified
HIPAA
Compliant
Certified
Every edit
Tracked
To the source
Role-based access
CFO, VP and auditor views from one source.
CFO
VP Sales
Permissions on every view
User-level access wherever your numbers show up.
Viewing as David
Marketing$1.24M
Sales
Full audit trail
Who, what, when, before and after.
Maya edited Q3 rent2:14 PM
David approved forecast2:31 PM
SSO
Okta, Microsoft Entra, Google.
Single sign-on enabled

See three scenarios on your own numbers.

Turn what-ifs into action. Bring one question from your last board meeting: we connect the sources, build the cases live, and trace a figure to the transaction behind it.

FAQs

Scenario planning questions, answered.

What is scenario planning?

Scenario planning is the practice of modeling how the business performs under different assumptions, usually a base, upside, and downside case. It shows leaders the range of outcomes before they commit to a plan. In Cube, every scenario branches from the same live actuals, so the difference between cases is the assumption that changed.

What is the difference between scenario planning and forecasting?

A forecast predicts the single most likely outcome. Scenario planning models several possible outcomes side by side, so leaders can prepare for each. Cube runs both in one governed model, so the forecast and every scenario share the same actuals and definitions.

How do you automate scenario planning?

Build scenarios on one connected model instead of copied workbooks, so actuals refresh every case at once and a driver change recalculates the P&L, headcount, and cash together. Cube connects to your GL, CRM, and HRIS, and FP&Agents can build a new case from a plain-English prompt.

What is the best scenario planning software?

The best scenario planning software builds every case from live actuals, lets finance change drivers and see the full P&L, headcount, and cash impact at once, compares cases side by side, and traces every figure to the source. Cube does this as the Agentic FP&A Platform, in the spreadsheets, decks, and chat tools your team already uses. 

What should you look for in scenario planning software?

Look for scenarios built on live actuals rather than copies; driver-based modeling across revenue, headcount, and expenses; side-by-side comparison; version control and approvals; drilldown to source transactions; role-based access; and audited security such as SOC 1 and SOC 2. Also check whether the team can keep working in Excel or Google Sheets, since that decides adoption. 

How many scenarios should a finance team model?

Most teams keep three: a base case tied to the board plan, an upside, and a downside. Add targeted cases for specific decisions, such as a hiring freeze or a price change. In Cube, any number of cases share one base, so adding a scenario does not add a file to maintain.

What is driver-based scenario planning?

Driver-based scenario planning changes the operating inputs, such as price, volume, win rate, headcount, and start dates, and lets the model calculate the financial result. In Cube, each driver is visible and adjustable by case, so anyone can see what moved between scenarios.

What data do you need for scenario planning?

You need current actuals from the GL, pipeline from the CRM, headcount and compensation from the HRIS, and the operating drivers behind revenue and spend. Cube connects to hundreds of source systems, including NetSuite, Salesforce, Workday, and HubSpot.

What is the difference between scenario planning and sensitivity analysis?

Sensitivity analysis changes one variable to see how much the result moves. Scenario planning changes several assumptions together to describe a full possible future. Cube supports both: flex a single driver, or build a complete case and compare it to the base.

How often should scenarios be updated?

Refresh scenarios whenever actuals close, usually monthly, and build new cases when a decision calls for one. With Cube, actuals sync on the schedule you set, every case recalculates as soon as they land, and FP&Agents flag material changes overnight.

Can department heads build their own scenarios?

Yes, within the access finance grants. Cube uses role-based permissions, so department heads can model their own cases while finance controls what gets published. They can work in Cube Web, Excel, Google Sheets, Slack, or Teams, from the same governed source.

Does scenario planning software replace Excel?

No. Teams keep building in Excel or Google Sheets. Cube fetches live, governed numbers into their templates, and scenario edits publish back to the model, so every case stays in sync without copying files.

Is scenario planning software secure?

It should be audited and access-controlled. Cube is SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type 2 audited, with SSO and SAML support, role-based permissions, encryption in transit and at rest, and a full audit trail on every driver, mapping, and plan change.

Still have questions? See it on your own scenarios.
Start here

What is scenario planning?

Scenario planning models how the business performs under different sets of assumptions, so leaders can see the range of outcomes before committing to a plan. A typical model holds a base case, an upside, and a downside, plus cases built for specific decisions.

Scenarios are only as reliable as the base they start from. Cube builds every case on the same live actuals, so the difference between scenarios is the assumption, not a copy error.

Top-down

Base, upside, and downside

Three cases that bracket the likely range of outcomes.

Bottom-up

Driver-based scenarios

Change price, volume, hiring, or timing and let the model calculate.

Decision

Decision-specific cases

A hiring freeze, a price change, or an acquisition, modeled on demand.

Scenario

Sensitivity analysis

One driver flexed to see how far the result moves.

Why scenario planning matters

Plans rarely play out as written. Scenarios show leaders what to do if bookings slip, costs rise, or a hire starts late, before it happens. Finance that can answer a what-if in minutes, on numbers the board trusts, moves from reporting the past to shaping the decision.

How to build a scenario model

The same five steps apply whether the model lives in a spreadsheet or in Cube.

  1. 1.
    Start from current actuals. Load closed actuals from the GL so every case begins from the same base.
  2. 2.
    Choose the drivers. Pick the few inputs that move the result most, such as price, volume, headcount, and timing.
  3. 3.
    Build the cases. Set driver values for the base, upside, and downside, and add any decision-specific cases.
  4. 4.
    Compare the outcomes. Line up revenue, EBITDA, headcount, and cash for each case, and agree on the triggers for acting.
  5. 5.
    Refresh as actuals land. Each period, update the base with actuals and check which case the business is tracking toward.

Key scenario planning metrics

Base case
The expected outcome, usually tied to the board-approved plan.
Upside and downside
Cases that bracket the realistic range around the base.
Driver
An operating input, such as price or headcount, that the financial result depends on.
Sensitivity
How much the result moves when one driver changes.
Cash runway
The months of operation current cash supports under each case.
Trigger
The signal, such as a bookings miss, that tells leaders to switch plans.

Scenario planning vs. forecasting

Scenario planning Forecasting
Answers What happens if our assumptions change? What is most likely to happen?
Built from Alternate driver values on the same base. Current actuals and the latest pipeline.
Cadence On demand, plus each planning cycle. Monthly, on a rolling basis.
Accuracy depends on A trusted base and the right drivers. Clean, current actuals.
In Cube Cases that branch from one governed base. A rolling forecast from the same model, so both tie.

Manual spreadsheet vs. Cube

Step Manual spreadsheet With Cube
Gather the data Paste actuals into each scenario workbook by hand. Sources stay connected; actuals land in the model mapped and consolidated.
Build a new case Duplicate the file and rewire every link. Branch a case from the base and change the drivers.
Compare cases Copy outputs from each file into a summary tab. Every case lines up on one view, from one model.
Update a driver Change it in every copy and hope they match. Change it once; every case recalculates.
Defend a number Trace it through pasted tabs and hope the trail holds. Drill from the figure to the source transactions.