Unified Financial Data: One Governed Model for FP&A | Cube

Platform · unified data

Every system speaks a different language. Cube makes them one.

Unified financial data means your ERP, HRIS, CRM, and warehouse feed one governed model. Every report, plan, and answer agrees.

The reconciliation ritual

Why don't your numbers agree?

Five versions of revenue

The ERP, the CRM, billing, and the board deck each tell a different story, and someone has to referee.

Definitions drift

Headcount, margin, and ARR mean something different in every tool, so every review starts with whose number is right.

The export ritual

The files arrive late, the pasting runs past midnight, and you walk into the board meeting hoping it all ties.

One governed model

How unified financial data works

Cube delivers trusted, decision-ready data, everywhere you work, and where AI can do its best work. It starts with hundreds of source systems feeding one layer.

See your systems land in one model.On the demo we connect a sample stack and watch the same number show up in a spreadsheet, a dashboard, and a chat answer.

Four ways in

How does the data get into Cube?

Every source connects through one of four paths, whichever fits the system.

Pre-built connectors

Native connections for major ERP, HRIS, CRM, and warehouse platforms.

JDBC for any SQL engine

Point Cube at the database and map the tables once.

Direct APIs

Governed API pulls for systems with open endpoints.

Automated file sync

Scheduled flat-file drops for everything else, validated on arrival.

All four end the same way: mapped once to your model, synced on a schedule, traceable to the source.

Live, not exported

One P&L, fed by every system

Actuals stream in from the ERP, payroll from HRIS, pipeline from CRM. The plan builds around them and publishes back.

fetched live from Cube plan inputs, published back to Cube bi-directional: fetch actuals in, publish plans back

Structure, governed

How do five systems map to one model?

Every source account maps once into rollups finance owns. When a new account appears, Cube proposes the mapping and finance approves it.

How the sources see it
NS 6420 · Cloud hosting
NS 6435 · SaaS subscriptions
WD 5010 · Base pay
WD 5020 · Benefits & taxes
NS 6810 · Airfare & lodging
by departmentby entityby regionby vendor
  • Operating expenses
    • Payroll & benefits
      • Base pay WD 5010
      • Benefits & taxes WD 5020
    • Cloud & software
      • Cloud hosting NS 6420
      • SaaS subscriptions NS 6435

Change the view, keep the model. Same accounts, new rollup.

NS 6437 · AI toolingnew account detected in NetSuite proposed → Cloud & software · 96% ApproveAdjust
Watch a mapping happen live.Bring your chart of accounts. We map a source system against it on the call.

Why teams unify

What changes when the numbers agree

Does it solve my problem?

Reporting week becomes a morning

Actuals land in the report as they post. The week of manual assembly becomes a morning of review.

How is it different?

Built at finance grain

Warehouses store tables. Cube holds accounts, dimensions, and definitions, the shape finance actually plans in.

Can I trust it?

Traced to the transaction

Any figure opens to the rows behind it, in the spreadsheet, the dashboard, or the board deck.

FP&Agents · on one model

Agents that work because the data is one

FP&Agents run on the governed model, so the answer in chat, the deck, and the spreadsheet is the same answer.

Data Manager

Watches every source, flags schema changes, and proposes new mappings for finance to approve.

Analyst

Answers ad hoc questions from the model, with a trace to the source under every figure.

Business Partner

Delivers the same governed numbers to every stakeholder, in the surface they already use.

Where the data lands

Governed data flows into the tools your team already lives in. Your workflows stay; everything underneath gets smarter.

Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot work from governed finance data via Cube MCP.

Where one model pays off

The workflows that get easier

Board reporting

The deck pulls consolidated actuals itself, and every figure survives the follow-up question.

Variance analysis

Budget to actual with the drivers attached, drillable to the transaction.

Rolling forecasts

Forecasts build on live actuals instead of last month's export.

Headcount planning

HRIS headcount and payroll land in the plan automatically.

Consolidations

Entities, currencies, and eliminations run as rules in the model. See financial business logic.

Ad hoc answers

The CEO's Tuesday question gets a governed answer, with sources attached.

See it on your own data.

A demo personalized to your stack: your ERP, your warehouse, your reports.

Book a demo

Governed by default

Unified doesn't mean exposed

Bringing the data together tightens control instead of loosening it. The full posture lives on our security page.

SOC 2 Type II SSO & SAML GDPR Audit trail

Read-only connections by default

Cube reads from your sources; nothing writes back without permission.

Least-privilege access

Role and entity-level permissions decide who sees what.

Every change logged

Mappings, rules, and edits carry a full audit trail.

Encrypted end to end

In transit and at rest.

Put your controls questions to us.Bring the security questionnaire. We answer it live.
Thousands of finance professionals work on one model.See what your close, your forecast, and your board deck look like when the numbers agree.

Already convinced? Book a demo. Still researching? The rest of this page is for you.

The definition

What is unified financial data?

Unified financial data

Unified financial data is finance data from the systems a business runs, such as ERP, HRIS, CRM, billing, and data warehouses, brought into one governed model with shared definitions, mapped dimensions, and a traceable path from every reported number back to its source transaction.

It replaces exports and manual reconciliation with numbers that agree in every report, plan, and answer. The logic that turns that data into official numbers has its own page: financial business logic.

The hard part

Why is unifying financial data difficult?

Different grains

The GL posts journals, the CRM tracks deals, the warehouse holds events. Cube maps each source to finance grain: accounts, periods, dimensions.

Conflicting definitions

Every tool has its own headcount. One governed dictionary decides, and every surface inherits it.

Constant change

Sources add accounts and fields weekly. The Data Manager agent flags changes and proposes mappings, and finance approves.

Currencies and entities

Multi-entity data needs translation and eliminations. Those run as rules in the model.

Access control

Unifying the data cannot mean everyone sees everything. Entity and role permissions travel with it.

Trust and audit

A unified number nobody can verify is worse than five spreadsheets. Every figure traces to the source transaction.

Honest comparison

What does unified change day to day?

The workflowExports & spreadsheetsUnified in Cube
Getting the numbers×Export from each system, paste, reconcileSynced on a schedule, mapped once
Definitions×Live in each analyst's workbookOne governed dictionary
Freshness×As of the last exportCurrent when you open the report
A new account appears×Someone notices in the variance reviewFlagged and mapped with finance approval
Audit×Reconstruct the trail by handTrace to the source row

Both columns are honest. Exports work; they just do not scale past a handful of systems.

Four approaches

What are the ways to unify finance data?

A warehouse alone

Strong plumbing for data teams, though finance still rebuilds grain and definitions on top of it.

BI on top

Dashboards present the data well, though they read only; planning and write-back happen somewhere else.

Legacy EPM

Unified in one place, though models are rigid and changes queue behind specialists.

The Agentic Finance Layer

Cube's approach: one governed model at finance grain, business logic built in, delivered to every surface you work in.

Before you buy

What should you look for in unified finance data software?

Ground rules first, vendor checklist second. The ground rules hold no matter whose software you choose.

Ground rules that hold for any vendor

Start from the workflows

Map the reports, plans, and forecasts you actually produce before touching a connector.

Fix definitions before tooling

Agree what headcount, margin, and ARR mean; software enforces a dictionary, it cannot write one.

Keep finance the owner

Mappings and definitions should belong to the team accountable for the numbers.

Unify incrementally

Start with the ERP, add sources one at a time, and validate each against last close.

The buyer's checklist

Coverage of your actual stack

Hundreds of source systems, checked against the ones you run.

A finance-grain model

Accounts, dimensions, and definitions, and raw tables left to the warehouse.

Mapping finance can own

Proposed by the software, approved by your team, with no code.

Lineage on every number

Trace to the transaction from any surface, always.

Spreadsheet write-back

Fetch live actuals into your file and publish plans back.

Governance built in

SSO, role and entity permissions, and a full audit trail.

Check coverage against your own systems: ERP and accounting, HRIS and payroll, CRM, data and BI, ATS, and payments and banking, or browse the full directory.

See every number agree.

A demo personalized to your stack: your ERP, your warehouse, and your reports feeding one governed model.

Book a demo

No prep needed. Just bring the names of your source systems.

Questions finance teams ask.

Yes. Snowflake, Google BigQuery, Amazon Redshift, and Databricks connect through Cube's warehouse connectors, and any engine with a JDBC driver connects through direct SQL, with no custom build.
er that gives AI assistants governed access to a company's financial model, with permissions and transaction lineage enforced on every query. The Cube MCP Server is that layer for your Cube model: the assistant asks in plain language, and the answer comes from the same governed model Cube delivers everywhere work happens, with the source transaction one click away.
Yes. SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, Azure SQL, and any other JDBC-capable database connect the same way a warehouse does: a read-only role, a schedule, and a mapping into your model.
Setup is finance-led with one ask of your data team: a read-only role scoped to the tables finance needs. From there your team reviews the proposed mappings and approves them, with guided onboarding from Cube.
On a schedule you control. Most teams sync daily, and more frequently for metrics that move during the day. You can also trigger a sync on demand.
Yes. Operational drivers from the warehouse land in the same governed model as your accounting actuals, so revenue per unit, cost per customer, and driver-based forecasts read from one place instead of a stitched spreadsheet.
Cube connects to BI both ways. As a source, it pulls the curated data sources and metrics your team already maintains in platforms like Tableau, Looker, and Power BI. As a destination, those same dashboards read the governed numbers Cube maintains, so finance and BI finally agree.
Yes. The Cube MCP Server speaks the open Model Context Protocol, so your platform team can point any agent framework at the governed model. Custom agents inherit the same role-based access, audit trail, and transaction lineage the FP&Agents use, so every figure they return is one your finance team can stand behind.
Yes. Cube's patented bi-directional sync fetches live drivers and actuals into your spreadsheets and publishes plan inputs back to the governed model, so the spreadsheet stays a first-class surface rather than a copy.
The operational drivers your plan actually moves on: product usage, pipeline snapshots, billing events, headcount cuts, and unit economics. Cube maps those tables to the accounts and dimensions finance plans by, and leaves the rest of the warehouse alone.
 
The Cube MCP Server connects Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, and any MCP-compatible assistant to a trusted financial model, so answers arrive decision-ready and trace to the source transaction.
 
Generic database MCP connectors return rows without context, permissions, or lineage.
When schemas change or new tables appear, Cube's Data Manager agents propose the mapping with a confidence score, and finance approves or adjusts it. Every change is logged, so the model stays clean and auditable.
An accounting integration pulls structured financials, the general ledger, from systems like NetSuite or QuickBooks. A warehouse connection pulls operational data, like pipeline or usage, from Snowflake or Databricks. Cube supports both, so financial and operational drivers live in one model.